Good morning Mom,
I know its now early morning in VN and ur still sleeping when I write this letter. But i dont want to give u a wake-up call and make u shocked with what im gonna tell u. Dont worry, Mom. There s nothing bad happen here to me. But I think it might be shocking to u. So plz plz plz be well prepared for what ur gonna read.
Mom, I m gonna have a tatoo. Im serious, Mom. I have been thinking of it for months and considering the consequences i will likely take if i get a tatoo; so just let u know that i dont come to this decision because im moody. Mom, I know u will be pissed off to know that, and I understand why u will get so angry at my decision. In our culture, its inappropriate for having a tatoo under our skin. I know u may worry that people will consider me "a gangster member" when I tatoo myself, which will probably affect negatively on my career once im out for work. But Mom, i m gonna have a tiny tatoo on my shoulder where I can cover it with formal suits, and its absolutely not easy for people to notice if they just glance at me. And since i have taken it seriously, I can get over the pain having my tatoo scarred under my skin and I also wont look back or suffer from regretting having it later.
So, Mom, plz dont worry about me. Your little girl is now mature enough to take responsibily for what she's done. I will protect myself as well as u, my greatest Mom, have been doing it to me for more than twenty years, I promise.
Love u always!!!
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Friday, April 22, 2011
Journal 15: "Facebook: Ruining my education"
Ostrowski, H. (2011, April 21). Facebook: Ruining my education. dailytitan. Retrieved January 21, 2011, from www.dailytitan.com/2011/04/21/facebook-ruining-my-education/
In this article, H. Ostrowski uses claim of cause to convince us that Facebook is ruining our education by taking herself as an example. According to her, Facebook, the most popular social network today, does not only distract us from important things (spending too much time on Facebook, typing away on Facebook chat in classrooms), but also disturb our roomates who "incidently" get their eyes caught on the laptop addicts' screens. To strengthen her argument, the author also points out the result of a 2008 article from The New York Time about negative effects of social network sites on "slowing study habits". It's obvious that she tries to use ethos and pathos appeal to buy the readers' agreement.
However, her argument is not persuasive to me for some reasons. Firstly, she doesnt give the readers any number of students who are distracted by Facebook in classrooms. As far as the article shows, she is the only one who got distracted by Facebook, which doesnt guarantee that all her classmates or the students in the school experience the same disturbance. Secondly, she blames it on her friends' use of Facebook in class and in library for ruining her attention on studying. But she doesnt mention whether her friends make noise while using Facebook; or it is herself who is so curious on what other people are doing and easily loses her self-attention. And lastly, the evidence she cites from the The New York Time writer Motoko Rich doesnt help to strengthen her argument: "Hours spent prowling the Internet are the enemy of reading – diminishing literacy, wrecking attention spans". The readers will cast doubt on this phrase. Are the social network cites like Facebook the only cause? How about online games and porn movies that poor performance in studying is contributed to. The argument, thus, is warranted.
In this article, H. Ostrowski uses claim of cause to convince us that Facebook is ruining our education by taking herself as an example. According to her, Facebook, the most popular social network today, does not only distract us from important things (spending too much time on Facebook, typing away on Facebook chat in classrooms), but also disturb our roomates who "incidently" get their eyes caught on the laptop addicts' screens. To strengthen her argument, the author also points out the result of a 2008 article from The New York Time about negative effects of social network sites on "slowing study habits". It's obvious that she tries to use ethos and pathos appeal to buy the readers' agreement.
However, her argument is not persuasive to me for some reasons. Firstly, she doesnt give the readers any number of students who are distracted by Facebook in classrooms. As far as the article shows, she is the only one who got distracted by Facebook, which doesnt guarantee that all her classmates or the students in the school experience the same disturbance. Secondly, she blames it on her friends' use of Facebook in class and in library for ruining her attention on studying. But she doesnt mention whether her friends make noise while using Facebook; or it is herself who is so curious on what other people are doing and easily loses her self-attention. And lastly, the evidence she cites from the The New York Time writer Motoko Rich doesnt help to strengthen her argument: "Hours spent prowling the Internet are the enemy of reading – diminishing literacy, wrecking attention spans". The readers will cast doubt on this phrase. Are the social network cites like Facebook the only cause? How about online games and porn movies that poor performance in studying is contributed to. The argument, thus, is warranted.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Journal 14
Kirschvink, J. L. (2000). Earthquake prediction by animals: Evolution and sensory perception. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(2), 312-323. doi:10.1785/0119980114
This article is written by Dr. Kirschvik, who has a strong background in geology and biology. He is now on the falcuty of California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological and Panetary Science. In this article, he is trying to find out a reasonable explanation for the question: "why can animals sense earthquakes? ". According to his knowlegde combined with the data collected from other renowed professors and reliable sources, it is animals' evolutionary mechanism that enables them to link their preception to the earth's precursors before the earthquakes occupy. Thus, I think I can use his ideas to support for my argumentative essay thesis that animals are superior to us in predicting earthquake.
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
RESEARCH TOPIC
At first, I came up with a topic involving in my business major, a topic that has caused a lot of controversy to the experts, "How can we realize that there is a bubble in real estate market?". And of course, it led me to not only a volume of contentiousness but also a bunch of headache after skimming my documentary. Thus, I decided to change my topic into "Animals vs Human in predicting earthquake". I was inspired by this topic after the earthquake in Japan. I wonder why we are now having a lot of tools that help us predict most things from weather conditions to meteoric collisions that are likely to happen, but not earthquakes. I also wonder why the animals always have weird behaviors before the quakes occupy. Can they sense the disasters coming? I can't answer those questions right now 'coz i havent collected enough information for myself and dug deeper into the database i have had. Just wait n see if I can find something interesting for my research paper.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)